Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. GOODMAN

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 26, 1973No. Appeal, 443PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Nix,

Appellants, David Goodman and Lee Goodman were tried jointly and were found guilty of unlawful possession of a narcotic drug in violation of The Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act of September 26, 1961, P. L. 1664, §4(q), 35 P.S. §780-4(q). Following the denial of all post-trial motions filed, each appellant was sentenced to a term of not less than two years nor more than five years imprisonment. The Superior Court affirmed the judgments of sentence with two judges dissenting.

On January 8, 1969, at approximately 7:50 p.m., police officers armed with a search warrant and a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Commonwealth v. PaquetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. ScoleriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. LittleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Commonwealth v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TedfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. United States v. McGloryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. DarushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. MontalvoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API