Legal Opinion
Claussen v. City of Lauderdale
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 6, 2004No. A03-1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge. *
Respondents, Rand and Barbara Claus-sen and Edward and Marilyn Salovich, brought this action against appellant, the City of Lauderdale (the city), and others, seeking title to certain property owned by the city and used as a park. Respondents eventually amended their complaint to seek adverse possession over part of the property.
In November 2001, the parties reached a tentative settlement in which the city agreed to grant respondents a use easement over the disputed property as long as ownership remained in respondents’ respective families. The settlement was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Nadeau v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Rogers v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Arndt v. American Family Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Neill v. HakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Gabler v. FedorukCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Gabler v. FedorukCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Robert Kagel v. Christian Brackey, Kagel Acquisition Company, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016