Legal Opinion

Smith v. Great Northern Paper, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 19, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDMAN, Justice.

Donald Smith appeals from a Workers’ Compensation Board decision denying Smith’s petition to commute his future benefits into a lump-sum settlement. 39 M.R.S.A. § 71-A (1989). Smith contends that there is no rational basis for the hearing officer’s decision that a lump-sum settlement would not be in Smith’s best interest. Because we conclude that the hearing officer had a rational basis for his decision, we affirm the decision and decline to reach the issues raised by Great Northern Paper Co. and the amicus parties. 1

Donald Smith suffered a work-related injury to his right…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maine Real Estate Commission v. KelbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  2. Dorey v. Forster Manufacturing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  3. Grant v. Dolan TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mathieu v. Bath Iron WorksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  2. Harding v. Sheridan D. Smith, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  3. Chase v. Town of MacHiasportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  4. Lamonica v. HolmesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  5. Longtin v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API