Smith v. Great Northern Paper, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
Donald Smith appeals from a Workers’ Compensation Board decision denying Smith’s petition to commute his future benefits into a lump-sum settlement. 39 M.R.S.A. § 71-A (1989). Smith contends that there is no rational basis for the hearing officer’s decision that a lump-sum settlement would not be in Smith’s best interest. Because we conclude that the hearing officer had a rational basis for his decision, we affirm the decision and decline to reach the issues raised by Great Northern Paper Co. and the amicus parties. 1
Donald Smith suffered a work-related injury to his right…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maine Real Estate Commission v. KelbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Dorey v. Forster Manufacturing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Grant v. Dolan TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mathieu v. Bath Iron WorksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Harding v. Sheridan D. Smith, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Chase v. Town of MacHiasportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Lamonica v. HolmesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Longtin v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.