Longtin v. City of Lewiston
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
SAUFLEY, Justice.
[¶ 1] Lucien Longtin appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board granting his employer’s petition for review and reducing his partial benefits based on his refusal of available work, pursuant to 39 M.R.S.A § 55-B (Supp.1990) (effective for injuries occurring after Sept. 30, 1989 and before Oct. 17, 1991), repealed and replaced by P.L.1991, ch. 615, § D-7. Long-tin contends that because his acceptance of the reinstatement offer would have resulted in a reduction of his retirement benefits upon early retirement, the offer was not “available” for purposes of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- St. Joe Container Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Levesque v. ShoreySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Fecteau v. Rich Vale Construction, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- Guaranty Fund Management Services v. Workers' Compensation BoardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Dorey v. Forster Manufacturing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Laskey v. SD Warren CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Tucker v. ASSOCIATED GROCERS OF MAINE, INC.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Dorr v. Bridge Construction Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Celentano v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Hogan v. Great Northern Paper, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.