Legal Opinion

Longtin v. City of Lewiston

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 30, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAUFLEY, Justice.

[¶ 1] Lucien Longtin appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board granting his employer’s petition for review and reducing his partial benefits based on his refusal of available work, pursuant to 39 M.R.S.A § 55-B (Supp.1990) (effective for injuries occurring after Sept. 30, 1989 and before Oct. 17, 1991), repealed and replaced by P.L.1991, ch. 615, § D-7. Long-tin contends that because his acceptance of the reinstatement offer would have resulted in a reduction of his retirement benefits upon early retirement, the offer was not “available” for purposes of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. St. Joe Container Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Levesque v. ShoreySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  3. Fecteau v. Rich Vale Construction, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  4. Guaranty Fund Management Services v. Workers' Compensation BoardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. Dorey v. Forster Manufacturing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Laskey v. SD Warren CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. Tucker v. ASSOCIATED GROCERS OF MAINE, INC.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  3. Dorr v. Bridge Construction Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  4. Celentano v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  5. Hogan v. Great Northern Paper, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API