Legal Opinion

Moberg v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided May 10, 1989No. 04-87-00443-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PEEPLES, Justice.

After the trial court denied his motions to suppress the fruits of a search, appellant Ray Moberg pleaded guilty to two separate charges of sexual assault of a child. Pursuant to a plea bargain, he was sentenced to consecutive twenty-year terms for each offense. Having preserved his right to appeal the court’s rulings, he contends that the motions to suppress should have been granted, and that without the unlawfully seized pictures and the evidence developed as a result of their seizure, the evidence is insufficient. We uphold the trial court’s rulings on the motions…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moberg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. State v. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API