People Ex Rel. Martin v. Worswick
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. A. L. Rhodes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
The defendant was elected to the office of mayor of the city of San Jose at a general city election held on the third Monday in May (May 19), 1902, and after-wards qualified and took possession of said office. The present proceeding is in the nature of quo luarranto, brought in the name of the people of the state, on relation of Charles J. Martin, to have it adjudicated that said election was illegal, null, and void, that said Worswick be ousted from his office, and that the relator, Martin, who was the immediate predecessor of defendant in the office, is entitled to said office upon the…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Strode v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- McMillan v. SiemonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Dillon v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- District Election of Supervisors Committee v. O'ConnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Rees v. LaytonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.