Legal Opinion

Anderson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 3, 1987No. C2-87-1108PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

Appellant seeks relief from a Rule 12.-02(5) dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Appellant contends that Minnesota’s direct action rule does not bar an injured plaintiff from seeking a declaratory judgment against defendant’s insurer where defendant fails to contest a denial of coverage. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Melanie Anderson filed a medical malpractice claim against respondent, Thomas Koehnen, M.D., alleging that medication negligently prescribed by him during her pregnancy led to her daughter’s permanent and severe birth defects…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morris v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Elzie v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Reagor v. Travelers Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Davis v. FurlongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Miller v. Market Men's Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurane Co. v. Wensmann, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  2. Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. FranckCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Bouchard v. KingDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
  4. Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. a & a Liquors of St. CloudCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API