Anderson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Appellant seeks relief from a Rule 12.-02(5) dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Appellant contends that Minnesota’s direct action rule does not bar an injured plaintiff from seeking a declaratory judgment against defendant’s insurer where defendant fails to contest a denial of coverage. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Melanie Anderson filed a medical malpractice claim against respondent, Thomas Koehnen, M.D., alleging that medication negligently prescribed by him during her pregnancy led to her daughter’s permanent and severe birth defects…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morris v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Elzie v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Reagor v. Travelers Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Davis v. FurlongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Miller v. Market Men's Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Westfield Insurane Co. v. Wensmann, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. FranckCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Bouchard v. KingDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. a & a Liquors of St. CloudCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002