Legal Opinion

Bouchard v. King

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided November 28, 1994No. Civ. 5-94-29PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. Introduction

This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to the consent of the parties, as authorized by Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), upon an informal Motion by the Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”), to be dismissed as a named party-Defendant. 1

The Motion has been submitted on letter briefs, with the Plaintiffs appearing by Michael T. Tierney, Esq.; the Defendant Thompson Rental, Inc., by David M. Weiby, Esq.; and the Defendants Scott King, Bruce King, Mark…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Ferens v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Tina BARRON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY OF CANADA LIMITED, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Medical Graphics Corp. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
  2. Moore v. Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API