Legal Opinion
Fort Smith v. United States Rubber Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 2, 1931PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.
The appellee, Eureka Fire Hose Manufacturing Company, operates as a department of the United States Rubber Company and both -will hereafter be referred to as appellees. The city of Fort Smith operates under a commission form of government with a mayor, and two commissioners known and designated as commissioner No. 1 and commissioner No. 2, the mayor being in charge of the Department of Public Affairs and being the chief executive officer of the city, and commissioner No. 1 being in charge of the Department of Accounts and Finances and the Department of Health and Safety, the Fire Department…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Polk County v. Mena Star Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Matheny v. Independence CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Scott County v. Advance-Rumley Thresher Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Texarkana v. FriedellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Forrest City v. OrgillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Boiles v. City of AbileneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- City of Little Rock v. the White Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Yaffe Iron Metal Company v. Pulaski CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Jackson v. Paulsel Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Vick Consolidated School District No. 21 v. NewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.