Legal Opinion

Matheny v. Independence County

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 23, 1925PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). The correctness of the decision of the circuit court depends upon the construction to be given to amendment No. 11, which has been declared adopted under the decision of this court in Brickhouse v. Hill, 167 Ark. 513. This court has held that Amendment No. 11 to the 'Constitution, authorizing county courts to issue bonds under certain conditions, is self executing, and that a county judge need not await the passage of an enabling act to order a sale of bonds. Cumnock v. Little Rock, 168 Ark. 777, and Lucas v. Reynolds, 168 Ark. 1084.

Amendment No. 11 was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wheat v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  2. Brickhouse v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. Ferrell v. KeelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. State ex rel. Smith v. AskewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  5. Cumnock v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Idaho Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. RobisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Penton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  3. Polk County v. Mena Star Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Lybrand v. Wafford (1)Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Gipson v. ManerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API