Vick Consolidated School District No. 21 v. New
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
This is a controversy between a school district and one of the teachers. The directors were also defendants along with the district, but we treat the case as being between the district and the teacher.
On January 1, 1944, Arthur G. New filed his complaint against the Vick Consolidated School District, seeking to recover $320 as an alleged balance due for teaching in 1942-43, and also seeking to recover his proportionate part of the balance remaining in the 1942-43 budget fund earmarked for teacher salaries under Act 319 of 1941. To this complaint the defendant filed a demurrer.
In the same…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Litchfield v. BallouSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Thomas v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Dickinson v. . City of PoughkeepsieNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- McBrian v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Revis v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Little Rock Road MacHinery Co. v. Jackson CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Brewer v. HowellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Gipson v. CrawfisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Parker v. Arkansas Real Estate CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.