Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ashworth

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 9, 2004No. Misc. Docket AG No. 5, Sept. Term, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, the petitioner, by Bar Counsel, acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751, 1 filed a Petition For Disciplinary or Remedial Action against Joseph C. Ashworth, the respondent. The petition charged that the respondent violated Rules 1.4, Communication, 2 1.5, Fees, 3 1.15, Safekeeping property, 4 8.1, Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters, 5 and

8.4, Misconduct, 6 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, as adopted by Maryland Rule 16-812. 7

We referred the case, pursuant to Rule 16-752(a), 8 to the Honorable Sean D. Wallace, of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrisbonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API