Legal Opinion

Schaefer v. O. K. Tool Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 6, 1930PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

The action of the court in denying the plaintiff’s motion to strike out the counterclaim is not assigned as error, and that question is not before us. Lest we should seem to approve the procedure followed, we feel constrained to say that the counterclaim, upon which the judgment in this action is based, was not one which could properly be filed, and should have been stricken out on motion. “A defendant by a counterclaim under the statute, cannot bring in for adjudication any matter that is not so connected with the matter in controversy under the original complaint that its consideration by…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Levy v. Daniels' U-Drive Auto Renting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. Hatch v. SpoffordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
  3. McGann v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  4. Wood v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  5. Bonney v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Blake v. LevySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Mozzochi v. BeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Vandersluis v. WeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API