Independent Life Ins. Co. v. Vann
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamfoed, J.
The appellant having prepared and filed a brief in accord with rulé 10 of the Supreme Court, and no brief for appellee having been filed, the statement of the case and the points relied on as error are taken as accurate and sufficient for decision.
The claim by appellant that the complaint is repugnant, in that it is alleged that the policy sued on was issued on, to wit, October 1st, when the policy made a part of the complaint bore date of October 8th, is without merit. Where the date in a policy sued on is under a videlicet, the time need not he proved exactly as alleged. Alexander v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. MandelbaumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Independent Life Ins. Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Sovereign Camp. W. O. W. v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Alexander v. Woodmen of WorldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Johns Undertaking Co. v. Hess-Strickland Transfer & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- National Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. MixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. LathamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Elrod v. TrussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Forbes v. SummersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.