Legal Opinion

Johns Undertaking Co. v. Hess-Strickland Transfer & Storage Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 23, 1925No. 6 Div. 368PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The complaint contained counts based on simple negligence and wanton conduct. The trial was without a jury, and resulted in judgment for plaintiff.

The question, “I will ask you, then, did the driver of the truck at the time and place, and immediately after the accident, state to you that he couldn’t stop the truck?” was not proper for impeachment, in the absence of a predicate. Lester v. Jacobs (Ala. Sup.) 103 So. 682. And where evidence is admissible for one of two or more purposes, within the issues, and is offered without restriction or limitation to the purpose for which it is admissible,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Georgia Cotton Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Alabama Great Soiitliern Railroad v. HawkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Lester v. JacobsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Alabama City G. & A. Ry. Co. v. HealdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Mobile Light R. Co. v. GadikSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barbour v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Kelly v. HanwickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Independent Life Ins. Co. v. VannAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Torrance v. WellsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Alabama Power Company v. SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API