Legal Opinion

Forbes v. Summers

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1953No. 7 Div. 123PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The question here in controversy is whether a petition to set apart a homestead to the widow under section 694, Title 7, as it appears in the Code of 1940, is sufficient to have conferred jurisdiction on the probate court to do so.

In this case a bill was filed in equity by some of the children of the decedent against others for a sale of the homestead for division, making as parties respondent the successors in interest of it from the widow, and seeking to have the title claimed by the widow and her successors resulting from that proceeding held to be void for want of *273jurisdiction of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Craig v. RootSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Keenum v. DodsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Singo v. McGheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Williams v. OvercastSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Miller v. First National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dorrough v. McKeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. Davis v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  3. Durham v. MimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Simpson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Davis v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API