Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Langula

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 2, 1930No. 27,618PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

This action was called for trial. The parties and their attorneys were present in court. Defendant moved to dismiss the action for want of prosecution. The motion was granted, and from the order of dismissal plaintiff has attempted to appeal to this court.

The order was nonappealable. Gottstein v. St. Jean, 79 Minn. 232, 82 N. W. 311.

Respondent argues that we have reversed the Gottstein case in Davis v. N. P. Ry. Co. 179 Minn. 225, 229 N. W. 86, wherein we parsed upon the merits of an appeal of this character. The answer is that counsel in that case did not raise the question of nonappeal-…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schuster v. SchusterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Gottstein v. St. JeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Davis v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Willeck v. WilleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Rock v. Hennepin Broadcasting Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API