Legal Opinion
Gottstein v. St. Jean
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 6, 1900No. Nos. 11,979-(125)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Otis, J.
1Opinion of the Court
PER OURIAM.
Appeal from an order of the district court dismissing the action for want of prosecution; in effect an order for judgment in defendant’s favor for his costs and disbursements. As early as 1872 this court held that an appeal would not lie from an order of dismissal (Searles v. Thompson, 18 Minn. 285 [316]), and this rule has been adhered to ever since. The point has not been made by respondent’s counsel, but this is immaterial. U. S. Savings, L. & B. Co. v. Ahrens, 50 Minn. 332, 52 N. W. 898.
Appeal dismissed.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cleveland v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- United States Savings, Loan & Building Co. v. AhrensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bulau v. BulauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Anderson v. LangulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Royal Realty Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- County of Renville v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.