State v. Taylor
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
Defendant assigns as error the trial judge’s actions in overruling his objections to certain statements made by the District Attorney during his argument to the jury.
A prosecuting attorney may not place before the jury incompetent and prejudicial matters not admissible in evidence or include in his argument facts not included in the evidence. State v. Westbrook, 279 N.C. 18, 181 S.E. 2d 572, vacated on other grounds, 408 U.S. 939, 33 L.Ed. 2d 761, 92 S.Ct. 2873; State v. Dockery, 238 N.C. 222, 77 S.E. 2d 664. However, arguments of counsel are largely in the control and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. HuffstetlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.