Legal Opinion

Brotherton v. Manhattan Beach Improvement Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1897No. 6639PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Rehearing of case reported in 48 Neb., 563.

1Opinion of the Court

Ryan, C.

There has been filed in this case an opinion, which was reported in 48 Neb., 563. A rehearing was afterward granted, and from this it results that it has again been presented for our further consideration. It is unnecessary to restate the facts involved, for they were very fully and accurately stated in the opinion above mentioned.

Counsel for the defendant in error, in their brief for rehearing, say there is only one point to which they wish to invite attention, and this they state in the following *215language: “It seems to us clear that the court overlooked the fact that the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brotherton v. Manhattan Beach Improvement Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Cooper v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  3. Dinnihan v. Lake Ontario Beach Improvement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Blakeley v. White Star LineMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. City of Longmont v. SwearingenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  3. Larkin v. Saltair Beach Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1905
  4. McKinney v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  5. Lyman v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API