Legal Opinion

Byland v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours Powder Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 14, 1914No. 18,884PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from Cherokee district court; Edward E. Sapp, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The action in the district court was to recover for injuries which the plaintiff sustained in an explosion at the powder mills of the defendant company where he was employed. The court sustained a demurrer to his evidence and rendered judgment against him, from which he appeals.

In a voluminous petition plaintiff set out the manner in which the defendant operated its powder mills, and alleged that the explosive materials used in making the powder were first mixed in four wheel mills; that the mixture was then conveyed in bulk by means of push…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Orcutt v. Century Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Dixon v. PlunsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. WagnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  5. Luengene v. Consumers Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Maki v. Murray HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. May Department Stores Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  3. Pope v. Edward M. Rude Carrier Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Jacobs v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Atkinson v. United Railroads of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API