Legal Opinion

Waddell & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 14, 1914No. 1242PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 33157 (T. D. 33660).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The goods in question consisted of scouring bricks. The appraiser reported the merchandise as “in the shape of bricks of various sizes. *64They are composed of silica, iron oxide, alumina, lime, and magnesia.” They are shown by the testimony to be known as rubbing bricks, scouring bricks, German brick, or Schumacher rubbing bricks, and by stipulation between the parties it is agreed that the merchandise is for scouring and is used for abrasive purposes in rubbing and cleaning marble. The merchandise was assessed for duty at 35 per cent ad valorem under the provision of paragraph 95 of the tariff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. WalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. Dingelstedt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  3. United States v. Burlington Venetian Blind Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. Traitel Bros. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. John C. Rogers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Kluyskens v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  3. Rowley v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API