Legal Opinion

Rowley v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 11, 1967No. C.D. 3113PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, Judge:

Plaintiff here protests the collector’s classification of “Triple Rojo,” a building construction material imported from Mexico, as manufactures of earthy or mineral substances, not specially provided for, other (not decorated), under paragraph 214 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, for which it was assessed at 15 per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiff claims the merchandise should have been classified under paragraph 201(b) as brick, not specially provided for, not glazed, enameled, painted, vitrified, ornamented, or decorated in any manner, and dutiable at the modified rate of 50…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morrill v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Waddell & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. Marks Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rowley v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API