Legal Opinion

CMS Contract Management Services v. Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 25, 2014No. 2013-5093PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RADER, Chief Judge.

The Court of Federal Claims denied CMS Management Services et al.’s (Appellants) request to set aside as unlawful the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) solicitation and award of contract administration services related to Section 8 of the Housing Act. Because the Performance-Based Annual Contribution Contracts (PBACCs) are procurement contracts, not cooperative agreements, this court reverses.

I

The Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement Act (FGCAA) sets forth the type of legal instrument an executive agency must use when awarding a federal grant or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pai Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Baird Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  3. Maintenance Engineers v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Cms Contract Management Services v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Tinton Falls Lodging Realty, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  2. Palladian Partners, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  3. Hymas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  4. Ashmore v. CGI Group Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  5. Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API