Legal Opinion
Hymas v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 14, 2016No. 2014-5150PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge WALLACH. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge STOLL.
WALLACH, Circuit Judge.
Appellant United States (“Government”) appeals the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“Claims Court”) finding that it possessed subject matter jurisdiction under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1) (2012), to resolve the instant action filed by Jay Hymas, doing business as Dosmen Farms. Hymas v. United States, 117 Fed.Cl. 466, 486-88 (2014). The Government also contests the Claims Court’s collateral finding that the United States Department of the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- AgustaWestland North America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- New York & Presbyterian Hospital v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Canpro Investments, Ltd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Stephens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- R. Acosta, Secretary, LABR v. Hensel Phelps ConstrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.