Legal Opinion
Cms Contract Management Services v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 19, 2013No. 12-852C, 12-853C, 12-862C, 12-864C, & 12-869CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pre-award Bid Protests; Project-based HUD Section 8 Housing Assistance Program; Procurement Contracts Contrasted With Cooperative Agreements; 31 U.S.C. §§ 6301-6308; Applicability of Competition in Contracting Act and Federal Acquisition Regulation; Analysis of HUD Housing Assistance Statutes and Regulations.
OPINION AND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.
This consolidated bid protest involves five substantially equivalent suits challenging a 2012 Notice of Funding Availability (“NOFA”) issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). The purpose of the NOFA is to fund HUD’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- CMS Contract Management Services v. Massachusetts Housing Finance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Hymas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Cms Contract Management Services v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Housing Authority of the City of SlidellUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Housing Authority of the City of SlidellUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.