Legal Opinion

State v. Dahlstrom

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 6, 1925No. 24,443PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny and appeals. The main grounds urged for a reversal are: The evidence is insufficient to warrant conviction, misconduct of the county attorney, and errors in the charge of the court.

The evidence tending to show the commission of crime is, in brief: In the banking rooms of the State Bank of Parkers Prairie another corporation named the Parkers Prairie Investment Mortgage Company held forth dealing in lands and making loans. The stockholders of the bank were also stockholders of the investment company and the officers of the bank were also…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DolliverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. State v. CowderySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Survis v. A. Y. McDonald Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. State v. HokensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API