Legal Opinion

State v. Hokenson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 10, 1941No. 32,072PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Convicted of the offense of grand larceny in the second degree (Mason St. 1927, §§ 10358[2] and 10363[1]), defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for new trial.

The facts upon which the prosecution rests are these: Defendant, a lawyer of many years’ experience, admitted to practice in June 1917, engaged in the practice of his profession at Cass Lake in the early part of 1937. In July 1937 one Robert Parker was injured while employed by a lumber company. Defendant was retained by Parker to proceed under the workmen’s compensation act against the company and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. PehrsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. State v. BaumhagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  3. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. State v. TraverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. State v. OmodtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JamiesonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  2. Survis v. A. Y. McDonald Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. State Ex Rel. Peterson v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. State Ex Rel. O'Neill v. RiggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API