Legal Opinion
State v. Dolliver
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 19, 1923No. 23,003PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
The defendant was convicted of crime and appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The case was here before and is reported in 150 Minn. 155, 184 N. W. 848. It was remanded for a new trial.
On the former trial the court charged the jury:
“The question of good reputation of the defendant is not of itself a sufficient fact from which a reasonable doubt of guilt may arise. Reasonable doubt of guilt must arise from all the testimony in the case.”
*299There was no other reference to the subject of character evidence in the charge.
On this trial the court charged the jury as follows:
“The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. SailorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- State v. DolliverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- State v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Bellcourt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- City of St. Paul v. WillierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. LohmeierCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.