Survis v. A. Y. McDonald Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
Appeal from an order denying defendants’ alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
For some time prior to the commencement of the controversy which culminated in the present litigation, plaintiff was engaged in business as a plumbing, heating, and tinning contractor at St. James, Minnesota, under the name “Survis Tin Shop.” During this period, defendant A. Y. McDonald Manufacturing Company (hereinafter called McDonald) manufactured and distributed plumbing, heating, and tinning equipment and supplies. Defendant S. P. Adams was its credit manager. On September…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Meyer v. BerlandiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Vansickle v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
- Burton v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Commonwealth v. HackneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Allen v. Osco Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. OsgoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Dick v. Watonwan CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1983
- Piper v. ScherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Young v. KlassDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.