Legal Opinion
In Re Crucible Steel Co. Of America
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 5, 1950No. 5730PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
The record discloses that in May of 194/ an application was presented by appellant to the Patent Office in accordance with the provisions of the Trade-Mark Act of 1905, now 15 U.S.C.A. § 1051 et seq., to register the trade-mark “Nu-Die” for use on steel rods, bars, plates, billets, slabs, blocks, and forgings. It was alleged the mark had been continuously used by appellant on the goods specified since June 11, 1940.
rp, . , i . . . ,, I he examiner refused registration of the , r ,, . . . ,1 ^ ,, , mark for the stated reason that the mark was regarded as merely descriptive of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Estate of P. D. Beckwith, Inc. v. Commissioner of PatentsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Burmel Handkerchief Corp. v. Cluett, Peabody & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- Plough, Inc. v. Intercity Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
- Bray v. TearsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eureka Williams Corp. v. Willoughby MacH. & Tool Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Baxter Laboratories, Inc. v. Don Baxter, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Baxter Laboratories, Inc. v. Don Baxter, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951