Legal Opinion · Dissent

Baxter Laboratories, Inc. v. Don Baxter, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 29, 1951No. Special Patent Docket 45Published

1DissentO’Connell, Judge

Our court, the courts of equity, and the Supreme Court of the United States have constantly recognized and repeatedly held that Congress in the enactment of the respective statutes as they now stand purposely intended to cut down and limit, but not to multiply and prolong, the number of appeals or new trials which the tribunals named in the statutes may hear and determine.

The universal trend imposed at this time throughout the nation by legislation and judicial decision is to the same effect and includes all kinds of litigious proceedings. Certainly, the case-splitting device, by which two…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  2. S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  3. Hoover Co. v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. United States Ex Rel. Baldwin Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Century Distilling Co. v. Continental Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API