In re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of Lieber
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Petitioner Daniel Martin Lieber seeks reinstatement to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota pursuant to Rule 18, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). Following a hearing, a panel of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board recommended that we reinstate Lieber, subject to an indefinite period of supervised probation and several conditions. We ordered a de novo hearing before a referee after expressing concerns with the panel’s findings. Following that hearing, the referee issued findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommendation that we reinstate…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of Reinstatement of WegnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- In Re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of KadrieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- In Re Reinstatement of TrygstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- In Re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of AnderleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re Reinstatement of ReutterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- In re Reinstatement of StockmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- In re Reinstatement of MoseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- In re SeversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- In re Disciplinary Action Against StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- In re Petition for Reinstatement of Herbert A. Igbanugo, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0191139Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.