Legal Opinion

In re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of Lieber

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 31, 2013No. A10-1705PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Petitioner Daniel Martin Lieber seeks reinstatement to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota pursuant to Rule 18, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). Following a hearing, a panel of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board recommended that we reinstate Lieber, subject to an indefinite period of supervised probation and several conditions. We ordered a de novo hearing before a referee after expressing concerns with the panel’s findings. Following that hearing, the referee issued findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommendation that we reinstate…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of Reinstatement of WegnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. In Re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of KadrieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. In Re Reinstatement of TrygstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. In Re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of AnderleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. In Re Reinstatement of ReutterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Reinstatement of StockmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. In re Reinstatement of MoseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. In re SeversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  5. In re Petition for Reinstatement of Herbert A. Igbanugo, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0191139Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API