New York Iron Mine v. First National Bank
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Marquette. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The plaintiff in error is sued as maker of three promissory notes and endorser of a fourth, all of which are copied in the margin.* By reference to these notes it will be seen that the name of plaintiff in error is subscribed or endorsed by W. B. Wetmore, *649and the contest has been made over his authority to make use of the name of plaintiff in error as he has done. The New York Mine is a corporation, having its place of operations at Ishpeming in this State. It was organized some fourteen years ago, with Samuel J. Til-den and William L. Wetmore as corporators. Mr. Tilden has had the principal…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Welland Canal Co. v. HathawayNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- The Floyd AcceptancesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Farmers & Mechanics' Bank v. Butchers & Drovers' BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- People v. BarkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Resurrection Gold Min. Co. v. Fortune Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Jackson Paper Manufacturing Co. v. Commercial National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Dispatch Printing Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Heard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.