Legal Opinion

Isnard v. Torres

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1855PublishedCited by 8 opinions

from the Second District Court of New Orleans, Lea, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSlidell, C. J.

Marquez is sued upon a promissory note made in the usual form by Torres, to the order of and endorsed by Marquez. On its face the note purports to be for $1,150. The defence is that at the time Marquez endorsed the note, it was for $150, but that after he endorsed it, and without his knowledge or consent, it was altered to $1,150.

The note which has been brought up in original for our inspection, presents the following form and in the same handwriting:

On the first line is written—

Nouvelle-Orléans le 29 avril 1854.

On the second line is written—

Dans soixante jours de cette date Je paierai

On the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Greenfield Savings Bank v. StowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Holmes v. TrumperMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. National Exchange Bank v. LesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Glasscock v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Hackett v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API