Isnard v. Torres
Supreme Court of Louisiana
from the Second District Court of New Orleans, Lea, J.
1Opinion of the CourtSlidell, C. J.
Marquez is sued upon a promissory note made in the usual form by Torres, to the order of and endorsed by Marquez. On its face the note purports to be for $1,150. The defence is that at the time Marquez endorsed the note, it was for $150, but that after he endorsed it, and without his knowledge or consent, it was altered to $1,150.
The note which has been brought up in original for our inspection, presents the following form and in the same handwriting:
On the first line is written—
Nouvelle-Orléans le 29 avril 1854.
On the second line is written—
Dans soixante jours de cette date Je paierai
On the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Greenfield Savings Bank v. StowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Holmes v. TrumperMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- National Exchange Bank v. LesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Glasscock v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1924
- Hackett v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.