Legal Opinion
In Re Fogel
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 11, 1996No. 95-BG-1384PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
Petitioner, an attorney disbarred by this court in 1989 following his conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude, see D.C. Code § 11-2503, seeks reinstatement as a member of the Bar of the District of Columbia. See D.C. Bar R. XI, § 16. The Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board), agreeing with the Hearing Committee, unanimously recommends that the petition for reinstatement be denied. We agree that petitioner has not met his burden of demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence that he is entitled to reinstatement. See D.C. Bar R. XI, § 16(d).…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re McBrideDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Rogers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- In Re BordersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re the Reinstatement of WiederholtAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- In re SaboDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- McFerguson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re ReynoldsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.