Legal Opinion

United States v. King

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided August 2, 1989No. ACM S28060PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

LEWIS, Senior Judge:

The appellant was found guilty, pursuant to his pleas, of wrongful use of cocaine. He was sentenced by members to a bad conduct discharge, hard labor without confinement for two months and reduction to airman basic. This sentence was approved by the special court-martial convening authority.

Over defense objection the military judge admitted for sentencing two letters of reprimand from the appellant’s Assigned Personnel Information File. R.C.M. 1001(b). Among the cited grounds for the defense counsel’s objection was that the appellant had not been advised that he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. OhrtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. WheelerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  3. United States v. WheatcraftU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. ShoupU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. SheridanUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  3. United States v. ShepherdU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. DonohueU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. GadsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API