Legal Opinion

United States v. Gadson

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 30, 1990No. ACM 28046PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

BLOMMERS, Senior Judge:

Despite pleas of not guilty, the appellant stands convicted of two uses of cocaine, evidence thereof consisting of urinalysis results. Prior to instructions on sentencing, trial defense counsel requested that the military judge instruct the members on the deleterious effect a punitive discharge might have on “future employment benefits of the individual, Sergeant Gadson, being able to find future employment.” The judge declined to do so, but advised counsel that the matter could certainly be argued. Defense counsel did raise the matter in argument. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. SorianoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  2. United States v. HendersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. DeYoungUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. HoltU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  5. United States v. BergerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. GodreauU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. RushArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API