United States v. Shoup
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
*821DECISION
LEONARD, Senior Judge:
Appellant asserts two errors for our consideration. First, he maintains that he was prejudiced by the trial counsel improperly arguing facts that were not in evidence. Second, he alleges that he was denied procedural due process with regard to the pretrial processing of his case. We find error, but no prejudice.
During his sentencing argument in a trial before military judge alone, trial counsel argued the following:
This is the third drug case you have heard this week; there were many before and there will be many more in the future ...
Over twenty people died in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. CliftonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. WoodsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. SebergU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1978
- United States v. KingU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. LarsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. BledsoeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. MarshU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. LugoU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. FaheyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.