Legal Opinion

Modart, Inc. v. Penrose Industries Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 18, 1968No. 16995_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

404 F.2d 72

MODART, INC., and Park & Tilford (a corporation) On behalf

of themselves and all other creditors, secured and

unsecured, of Penrose Industries Corporation (a Delaware

Corporation) et al. The Borden Company, Intervening Plaintiff,

v.

PENROSE INDUSTRIES CORPORATION (a Delaware Corporation), Sun

Ray Drug Co. (a Pennsylvania corporation) Joscar

Company, Appellant.

No. 16995.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Sept. 19, 1968.

Decided Oct. 18, 1968.

M. E. Maurer, Wexler, Mulder & Weisman, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Michael L. Temin, Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. American Surety Co. of New York v. FinletterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
  3. Warner v. Conn (Kopp)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Quinn v. Bancroft-Jones Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1926
  5. Modart, Inc. v. Penrose Industries Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API