Legal Opinion
Hubbard v. Hubbard
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 2002No. S-9562PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Timothy Hubbard was held to be equitably estopped from disestablishing paternity of his stepson, Joshua. On appeal he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence concerning the financial harm requirement of such a determination. We conclude that the evidence was sufficient to support a finding of financial harm.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Amy Hoover (subsequently, Hubbard) gave birth to a son, Joshua, in October 1991. Joshua's biological father was David Walters, a resident of Ohio. Alaska's Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED) brought a child support…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Wright v. BlackAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- B.E.B. v. R.L.B.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement v. KovacAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tufco, Inc. v. Pacific Environmental Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Alaska Fur Gallery, Inc. v. First National Bank AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Ogar v. City of HainesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Moore v. McGillisAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Alaska Fur Gallery, Inc. v. First National Bank AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2015