Legal Opinion

State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement v. Kovac

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1999No. S-8423, S-8424PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

R.M. was born to the marriage of Richard Romer and Darlene Wright; Romer was thus presumed to be R.M.’s father. Romer and Wright later separated and divorced. Several years afterward, the superior court ruled that Romer was not R.M.’s father and owed him no duty of support. Wright subsequently identified Dusan Kovac as R.M.’s father. Ater genetic testing confirmed the identification, the court entered summary judgment (1) rejecting Kovac’s claim that Romer is R.M.’s father by estoppel, (2) establishing Kovac as the father, and (3) ordering him to pay…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Matthews v. MatthewsAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Smith v. ColeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  4. State on Behalf of Hopkins v. BattNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Wright v. BlackAlaska Supreme Court · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division v. MaxwellAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. R.I. v. C.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division v. ButtonAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Hubbard v. HubbardAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Ri v. CcAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API