Hardy v. Hardy
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
On April 24, 1937, plaintiff Myrtle Hardy and defendant Oliver Hardy executed a property settlement agreement providing that defendant would pay $250 weekly for the support of plaintiff unless his income fell below $1,000 a week, in which case he would pay one-quarter of the amount he received. Plaintiff contends that defendant was bound to pay $250 weekly, regardless of his actual receipts in a particular week, if his income averaged over $1,000 a week. Defendant contends that in any week in which his receipts were less than $1,000, he was bound to pay only one-quarter of the amount actually…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Oil Well Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Wineburgh v. GayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Talmadge v. ArrowHead Reservoir Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Sarina v. PedrottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Bewick v. MechamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Larsen v. JohannesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.