Legal Opinion

Associated Surgeons, P.A. v. Watwood

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 29, 1976No. SC 1416PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHORES, Justice.

Associated Surgeons, P.A., filed suit against the defendant, a medical doctor, for breach of contract claiming $20,000 as liquidated damages pursuant to the contract. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss on two grounds: (1) The contract sued on expired, by its terms, before the alleged breach; and, (2) the provision providing for the payment of $20,000 liquidated damages is “. . . a restraint of the exercise of the medical profession and is therefore void and unenforceable.” The plaintiff appealed.

The plaintiff and defendant entered into a written employment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Odess v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. Chamberlain v. AugustineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Gant v. WarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fields Foundation, Ltd. v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  2. Thompson v. Wiik, Reimer & SweetSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Anniston Urologic Associates v. KlineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Burkett v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Spry Funeral Homes, Inc. v. DeatonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API