Legal Opinion

Anniston Urologic Associates v. Kline

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 7, 1997No. 1951874PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant, Anniston Urologic Associates, P.C. ("Anniston Urologic"), appeals from a partial summary judgment for the plaintiff, Dr. Michael B. Kline. Dr. Kline had sought a judgment declaring that parts of an employment contract and a stock redemption agreement were unenforceable as covenants not to compete, relying on Ala. Code 1975, § 8-1-1(a),1 and Anniston Urologic had sought by way of a counterclaim to require specific performance of the stock redemption agreement and to recover damages for an alleged breach of that agreement and, in addition, to recover damages for the alleged…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cherry, Bekaert & Holland v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Hill v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Odess v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  4. Chamberlain v. AugustineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Gant v. WarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cook v. Lloyd Noland Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Benchmark Medical Holdings, Inc. v. Rehab Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004
  3. Weathers v. City of OxfordCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  4. BAMA BUDWEISER OF MONTOGOMERY, INC. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Brown v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF MONTG. COUNTYSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API