Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Wiik, Reimer & Sweet

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 5, 1980No. 79-540PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Prior to September 16, 1971, Plaintiff-Appellant Mamie K. Thompson and her partner, Sylvia R. McCrary, practiced certified public accountancy in Mobile, Alabama, under the partnership name of McCrary and Thompson. On September 16, 1971, the Appellant and Ms. McCrary entered into a written contract to sell their accounting partnership to Defendants-Appellees. The "assets" to be conveyed under the contract were specifically enumerated in an eight-page appendix to the contract and included a list of clients as well as certain items of personal property. The contract also contained the following…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Grantham v. DenkeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Hill v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Odess v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  5. City of Birmingham v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Cherry, Bekaert & Holland v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Marsh v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Mann v. Cherry, Bekaert and HollandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  4. Youngblood v. BaileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. Benchmark Medical Holdings, Inc. v. Rehab Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API