Legal Opinion

Burkett v. Adams

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 9, 1978No. 77-60PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal arises from a judgment holding that a contract containing a non-competition clause was valid and enforceable, and that payments were due pursuant to the agreement. We reverse and remand.

The undisputed facts, stipulated at trial, indicate that on February 1, 1973, Appellee, Bernard L. Adams, was employed by Appellant Ronald E. Burkett, as a public accountant. Thereafter, on March 14, 1973, Adams and Burkett entered into two agreements for the sale of Adams' accounting business and the sale and/or lease of several assets of that business, including its good will. Contained within…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hill v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Odess v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. Lehmann v. State Board of Public AccountancySupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Gant v. WarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  5. Mason Corporation v. KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. Brendle, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Thompson v. Wiik, Reimer & SweetSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Dobbins v. Getz Exterminators of Ala., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  4. Mann v. Cherry, Bekaert and HollandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Benchmark Medical Holdings, Inc. v. Rehab Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API