Legal Opinion
Dixon v. MacK
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 10, 1980No. 80 CIV 3040 (LBS)PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAND, District Judge.
This case presents the question of whether an out-of-state defendant subjects himself to jurisdiction under the New York long-arm statute by virtue of the activities of his co-conspirators in New York, when he did not join the conspiracy until after its activities in New York had been completed.
Plaintiff Mitchell Dixon has sued a number of defendants, including William Rick, under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985, alleging a conspiracy to deprive Dixon of his civil rights and seeking damages and injunctive relief. The matter comes before this Court at present on a motion…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lehigh Valley Industries, Inc., and Lehigh Colonial Corporation, Vsv. Norman Birenbaum, and David BirenbaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Istituto Bancario Italiano SpA v. Hunter Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Chrysler Capital Corp. v. Century Power Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Daventree Ltd. v. Republic of AzerbaijanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- First Capital Asset Management, Inc. v. Brickellbush, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Bialek v. Racal-Milgo, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.