Legal Opinion
Lehigh Valley Industries, Inc., and Lehigh Colonial Corporation, Vsv. Norman Birenbaum, and David Birenbaum
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 28, 1975No. 367, Docket 75-7301PublishedCited by 217 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MULLIGAN, Circuit Judge:
This diversity action was commenced in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, by plaintiffs Lehigh Valley Industries, Inc. (Le-high) and its subsidiary Lehigh Colonial Corporation (Colonial), both Delaware corporations with principal places of business in New York. The plaintiff corporations are successors in interest to Colonial Shoe Ornament, Inc. (Ornament), a Massachusetts corporation since dissolved. The defendants are David Birenbaum (David), his brother Norman Birenbaum (Norman) and two foreign (Spanish) corporations, Lydia, S. A.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Henry J. Weller v. Cromwell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Walkovszky v. CarltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corp. v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by217 opinions
- Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Best Van Lines, Inc. v. Tim Walker, Docket No. 04-3924-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- David H. Stuart and Richard A. Whitaker v. Richard G. SpademanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. American BuddhaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.