Legal Opinion

Klahr v. Williams

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided May 19, 1970No. Civ. 5112 PhoenixPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Before JERTBERG, Senior Circuit Judge, and WALSH and CRAIG, District Judges. PER CURIAM.

In early 1966, following the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1, 84 S.Ct. 526, 11 L.Ed.2d 481, and Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 84 S.Ct. 1362, 12 L.Ed.2d 506, this court in this cause adjudged void and unconstitutional the Arizona statute (§ 16-727, A.R.S., 1956), districting the state for the election of representatives in the United States Congress and the constitutional and statutory…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Burns v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Wells v. RockefellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Assembly v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Ely v. KlahrSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Ferrell v. State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. HallDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1972
  5. Flateau v. AndersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API